Skip to Main Content

Information Literacy & Artificial Intelligence

Considering AI through a library lens

AI: Assistant, Collaborator, or Thief?

AI can serve multiple functions in your academic journey, each with different ethical implications:

Assistant

  • Generating search terms for library databases
  • Breaking complex assignments into manageable parts
  • Creating a study plan tailored to your learning style

Collaborator

  • Organizing research notes
  • Explaining challenging concepts
  • Creating visuals to illustrate ideas
  • Organizing a jumble of ideas into an outline

Human collaboration offers unique benefits that AI cannot replicate

  • Social connection and relationship building
  • Diverse perspectives shaped by lived experiences
  • Expert guidance from professors passionate about your success
  • Insights from your peers that challenge and expand your thinking

Campus resources for human collaboration

  • The Lorenzo A. Ramirez Library - drop in or book an appointment!
  • Your instructor's office hours
  • Canvas course discussion boards
  • The Writing Center, the STAR Center, the Math Success Center, and the Language Lab
  • Student clubs on campus

Thief

When AI use crosses ethical lines:

  • Submitting AI-generated work as your own
  • Using AI to bypass learning
  • Letting AI make critical decisions for you

If you prompt a bot to complete an assignment and submit its output, you're allowing convenience to steal an education from you. Clear writing is clear thinking. Regardless of how generative AI changes society in the coming years, you will need to have knowledge in your brain in order to make use of AI. 

Academic Honesty: Official SCC Policy

Introduction 

Students at Santiago Canyon College are expected to be honest and forthright in their academic endeavors. To falsify the results of one’s research, to steal the words or ideas of another, or to cheat on an examination corrupts the essential process by which knowledge is advanced. Academic dishonesty is seen as an intentional act of fraud, in which a student seeks to claim credit for the work or efforts of another without authorization or uses unauthorized materials or fabricated information in any academic exercise. 

We, as an institution, also consider academic dishonesty to include forgery of academic documents, intentionally impeding or damaging the academic work of others, assisting other students in acts of dishonesty or coercing students into acts of dishonesty. 

Procedures 

In cases where a violation of academic honesty is discovered, the faculty member is encouraged to file an “Academic Honesty Incident Report” form and distribute the form as specified. There are two categories of sanctions: Limited and College-wide. Limited sanctions include an academic action such as assigning a lower grade or a grade of “F or zero” for the test or project. College-wide sanctions include any sanction that will affect a student’s standing with the college-at-large, up to and including suspension or expulsion from the college. In matters relating to academic honesty violations, the primary responsibility for employing the Limited Sanctions rests with the instructor and the academic division where the violation allegedly occurred. The Associate Dean of Student Development will assist in all College-wide disciplinary sanctions at Santiago Canyon College.

Santiago Canyon College catalog 2025/2026
https://sccollege.edu/campus/collegeoffices/curriculum/Shared%20Documents/Catalog%20PDF/SCC_Catalog_print.pdf

Student Use of AI in Academic Work: Official Guidelines

A task force with faculty from both SCC and SAC developed these guidelines in Spring 2025:

  1. Understanding Usage Policies: Each class may have different policies regarding the use of generative AI tools. It is crucial to review your course syllabus and consult with your instructor to understand the specific rules for each assignment. Usage may be completely prohibited, permitted with restrictions, or encouraged with proper attribution. Utilizing AI to substantially complete assignments or exams is not permitted unless explicitly allowed by the instructor. Absent clear guidance from a course instructor, the use of generative AI tools will be treated similarly to assistance from another person; which can be appropriate or inappropriate, depending on the amount of assistance given.
  2. Citing Generative AI: Students are expected to adhere to standards of academic integrity regardless of whether they use AI. The best method is to find, read, and cite authoritative sources. However, if citing AI directly - say, because you have been assigned to use it, or because you are writing about AI and need to quote it directly to illustrate a point - here's how to cite it:

    a. In-Text Citation: When directly quoting text generated by an AI tool, attribute the text to the creator of the tool. For example, if using ChatGPT, you might write: "According to OpenAI's ChatGPT, 'quoted text here'."

    b. Reference List: Include a full citation in your reference list. Sample formats in APA and MLA style:

    APA
    OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. Retrieved from https://www.openai.com/chatgpt
    MLA
    "Importance of Voter Turnout" prompt. ChatGPT 4o, Open AI 28 Apr. 2025 https://chatgpt.com/share/680fd6d7-3130-800c-946a-53779abb1ec3
  3. Documentation and Attribution: Keep a history of your interactions with AI tools and be prepared to submit these records if requested by your instructor. This demonstrates appropriate use of the tools and supports your learning process.
  4. Validating AI Outputs: AI tools may generate incorrect, overly vague, irrelevant, or nonsensical outputs. It is your responsibility to verify the accuracy and reliability of any AI-generated content you use. Cross-reference information and ensure that AI-generated citations are valid.
  5. Data Privacy: Do not include personally identifiable information or sensitive data in prompts when using generative AI tools. Depending on the policies and practices of the AI service, the information collected might be made available to organizations who might use it in ways that are not in your best interest.
  6. Seeking Clarification: If you are ever in doubt about whether the use of generative AI is permitted for a specific task or assignment, consult your instructor before proceeding.

Broader Ethical Considerations

AI and Bias

AI systems reflect the data they're trained on, which can perpetuate existing biases:

  • Who creates the training data? Wikipedia, for example, has predominantly male editors (90% in 2018)
  • What perspectives are included or excluded? As of December 2024, only 20% of Wikipedia biographies were about women
  • Whose voices are amplified or silenced? Consider which demographic groups might be underrepresented

Environmental impact

AI systems require significant computing power and energy. Consider using AI thoughtfully and purposefully. For simple information (like definitions), traditional search engines are more environmentally responsible.

Labor and Attribution

AI models are trained on human-created work. Work that was created with massive amounts of time, energy, and passion. Consider accessing the original content referenced by AI, to appreciate the authentic human voice.

Preservation of Knowledge

As AI tools advance and become ever more ubiquitous, critical thinking and research skills are even more important - not less! 

Terms of Service

When using AI tools, be aware that:

  • Your prompts and responses may be stored by the applications
  • This data may be used to train future versions of AI systems
  • Different AI systems have different privacy policies
  • Some AI tools censor or restrict information

Remember that AI should assist your learning, not replace it. The goal of your education is to develop your own critical thinking skills, knowledge base, and unique perspective—things that AI cannot provide.